The meeting between the Academic Staff Union of Universities and the Federal Government ended in a stalemate for the third time on Wednesday, as the parties again failed to resolve the issues around the payment platform for salaries and other benefits.

Besides, ASUU was insisting that the N30bn Earned Academic Allowances offered by the Federal Government would be for its members alone, a demand the government team said was not feasible.

The government had offered N30b to all the unions in the universities and another N20b as revitalization fund, totalling N50b during their meeting on October 15.

Recall that ASUU had on March 23 begun an indefinite strike over the Federal Government’s insistence on implementing the Integrated Payroll and Personnel Information System, which the government said all its employees must adopt for their salaries to be paid.

Besides opposing the IPPIS,  the union also accused the FG of not abiding by agreements both sides signed a few years ago.

At their resumed meeting in Abuja on Wednesday which lasted for over two hours, the parties could not resolve the contentious issues around the payment system to be deployed.

It was gathered that ASUU was still insisting on the University Transparency and Accountability Solution which it developed as an alternative to the IPPIS.

However, the union submitted a document on UTAS for onward submission to the National Information Technology Development Agency for evaluation and testing of the software.

Briefing journalists after the parley, the Minister of Labour and Employment, Dr Chris Ngige said the university lecturers had earlier demanded N110b for the revitalisation of the university system, adding that the Federal Government offered N20b and N30b for earned academic allowances.

He noted that the N20b was offered to ASUU as a sign of good faith based on the Memorandum of Understanding entered into in 2013 as a result of the renegotiation they had with the government in 2009.

Ngige explained that the government was committed to the revitalization of the university system but added that it was constrained by the dire economic situation occasioned by the COVID-19 pandemic. He said: “This government is not against revitalization but this government says that because of the dire economic situation occasioned by COVID-19, we cannot really pay in the N110b which they are demanding for revitalisation. We offered N20b as revitalisation fund. On Earned Academic Allowances, the government offered N30b to all the unions in the universities, making it N50b altogether. ASUU is saying that the N30b should be for lecturers alone, irrespective of the fact that there are three other unions. So there is a little problem there. We don’t have any money to offer apart from this N30b.”

Ngige, however, noted that the meeting made relative progress on the UTAS as the union submitted their document on the software for evaluation by the NITDA.

He recalled that the Minister of Communication and Digital Economy, Isa Pantami had approved that NITDA ( the National Information Development  Agency) should subject UTAS to integrity test.

He said: “As you know last week, the Minister of Communication and Digital Economy had approved that NITDA gets their system (UTAS) and subject it to integrity test. This test should be conducted without fear or favour and as early as possible. So today (Wednesday), they have submitted the document for onward transmission to NITDA.”

The minister further pointed out that the transition period for the payment of the salary and other allowances had not been resolved as a result of the disagreement over the payment platform.

He added: “One other issue that has arisen is the issue of the transition period. How do you get the Earned Academic Allowances that is due to you or any other entitlement that the government wants to pay you? They want an exemption from the IPPIS and the government side headed by the Accountant-General of the Federation said that IPPIS is the only government-approved payment platform. So that is where we are for now.

“So we are all going back to our principals and they will receive from me the irreducible minimum of what the federal government has to offer.”

Ngige disclosed that the government side will meet on Friday and after that, they will communicate with ASUU and in communicating with them, if there is a need for a meeting, a date will be fixed for it.

Responding to a question on the seeming intransigence of ASUU, Ngige said the Federal Government may be forced to take legal action against the union if it failed to respond to the offers made to resolve the crisis and call off its eight-month strike.

The ASUU President, Prof. Biodun Ogunyemi said his delegation would consult with the stakeholders and revert to the government on the resolutions reached at the meeting.

While ASUU and the Federal Government are yet to agree on the payment platform, there was another twist in the saga as the Non-Academic Staff Union of Education and Associated Institutions (NASU) said it will not accept the payment of its members via the ASUU platform.

The General Secretary of NASU, Peters Adeyemi said that UTAS is not known to the union and its Senior Staff Association of Universities (SSANU).

Adeyemi revealed that both unions have developed their own payment platform named, ‘University General Peculiar Payroll Payment System (UGPPPS)’ which takes the peculiarities of non-teaching staffers into consideration.

He submitted that both NASU and SSANU will resist the imposition of UTAS on their members.

Adeyemi added: “We are aware that ASUU desires to have its own platform. We are warning that if the ASUU platform will be used to pay staffers in the universities, none of our members should be paid using that platform by the Federal Government. The reason for this is that we were not privy to how the system was developed. If the Federal Government will completely take off IPPIS from the universities and wants to use the ASUU platform, then they will use the ASUU platform for ASUU members while the government will use our own platform for our members.”

He argued further that it will be ironic and unjust for the Federal Government to use the ASUU platform to pay NASU and SSANU members when they were not part of the building of the platform from the beginning.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: